He’s on crack, of course, be he tries.

Boston Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby takes a run at showing how gay marriage hurts heterosexual marriage. He fails, utterly. His main point seems to be that: (1) Vermont has allowed 5,700 “civil unions” between homosexuals; and (2) Of those, 2,000 involve at least one partner who was formerly involved in a traditional marriage. From there, he finds the deep end:

Just a shred – but a jarring one. Of course, it doesn’t mean that Vermont’s civil union law broke up 2,000 straight couples. It does mean that where there used to be 2,000 traditional marriages, there are now 2,000 ruptured ones – and 2,000 gay or lesbian unions in their place. Were some of those marriages doomed from the outset? Probably. But it’s also probable that some of them weren’t. In another time or another state, some of those marriages might have worked out. The old stigmas, the universal standards that were so important to family stability, might have given them a fighting chance. Without them, they were left exposed and vulnerable.

How’s that again? Was there a causal relationship between the availability of de facto gay marriage and the breakup of those 2,000 unions? He doesn’t know. He doesn’t even try to say — to do so, he’d have to consider the time frame; however, he doesn’t even bother to ask how many of them broke up in the months after gay unions were legalized in Vermont. Instead, he commits the sort of error that a freshman statistics student should be ashamed of: he confuses correlation — and weak correlation at that — with causation. I wonder if he thinks that the availability of second (and subsequent) heterosexual marriages weakens initial unions? Should we ban those as well?

It’s time for right-wing closet cases to stop trying to tell people what they can and can’t do, who they can and can’t love, and how they can and can’t fuck. These characters would do well to revisit the documents that form the bedrock of our nation, and note well how the purpose of government in the eyes of the founders was to preserve rights, not restrict them.

Ah, Foo.

The new Foo Fighters video for Low has been rejected/banned by MTV. It stars Grohl and Jack Black. That is all I’m willing to say, aside from “ watch this” — you’ll need Real Player.

It’s a good news/bad news kind of thing.

As I’m sure you’ve heard, the good news is that even our hard-right Supreme Court still admits there’s such a thing as the right to privacy, and struck down Texas’ sodomy law in Lawrence v. Texas — and with it most if not all similar laws nationwide. Predictably, the religious right promptly became hysterical about “protecting marriage,” a point of view perhaps finding its apotheosis in this quote from Colorado-based Focus on Family (James Dobson’s organization, I believe):

“With today’s decision, the court continues pillaging its way through the moral norms of our country,” Mr. Minnery said in an interview. “If the people have no right to regulate sexuality, then ultimately the institution of marriage is in peril, and with it, the welfare of the coming generations of children.” Mr. Minnery said the ruling violates the rights of Texans who can no longer decide “what they find appropriate in terms of sexual behavior.”

A more careful reading of the decision would, I note, point out that Texans are still free to decide this issue for themselves; what they have lost is the legal right to make that decision for others. The right-wing American Center for Law and Justice filed an amicus brief in support of the law; chief counsel Jay Sekulow said “By providing constitutional protection to same-sex sodomy, the Supreme Court strikes a damaging blow for the traditional family and will only intensify the legal battle to protect marriage.” Er, sure, Jay. I’m still trying to understand how B follows A in this picture. (Both quotes from this Washington Times story.)

What confuses me is this: why is it so damned important to these people to keep homosexuals from marrying? Why does that make one’s own marriage, or the idea of marriage, less viable or weaker? What’s the big fucking deal? It’s also pretty important to note that these cannards are pretty far from any legal or Constitutional argument in support of a law that (1) violates Privacy as understood and laid out by Griswold and Roe and (2) has even more blatent equal protection problems (the Texas law prohibited only same-sex sodomy, not sodomy between a heterosexual couple; Justice O’Connor stated that this issue alone was enough to support her ruling).

In their pursuit of hetero-only marriage, would these matrimonial Chicken Littles barter away this right to privacy? Would they allow the government into their own bedrooms to regulate birth control, as Connecticut was doing prior to Griswold? It would seem so; hopefully, the American public will see this for what it is, and make clear that the State has no right to tell them how to fuck.

Anyway, now the bad news — which is really only bad if you thought Bill Frist was any better than his bigoted predecessor. Yesterday Reuters reported that the good Doctor would support a Constitutional admendment banning gay marriage. Look closely at this. Twice in memory the GOP has disliked some SCOTUS ruling, and then tried to patch the Constitution to do an end-run around it — here, on sodomy laws, and prior to this, on flag burning. In both cases — and here’s the part most worth noting — the proposed amendment would take away rights that SCOTUS says the Founders wanted us to have. Make no mistake; this party of less-intrusion and smaller-government actively pursues an agenda contrary to both points in order to pander to the religious right, and the White House is right there with them. Watch these people. They’re the biggest danger our country faces right now. We know the terrorists want to hurt us; at least they’re honest about it.

I’ve been lax.

It’s true. I’ve been too busy to attend to this little exercise in public onanism. However, there’s light at the end of the tunnel, and I have reason to believe it’s not just a train.

Until then, I offer this, which I have reason to believe will amuse many of you readers, especially those named Chris (Misters M. and J., this is for you).

Here’s a phrase you don’t hear often:

“Female Muslim Comic.”

[T]he Sept. 11 terrorist attacks changed everything. Initially, she ceased performing on the logic that this might not be the time for gags about Ramadan or, for that matter, anything funny a Muslim had to offer. Three weeks later, though, she took the stage in a Soho club called Amused Moose and, with a single joke, found the very, very thin line between acceptable comedy and abominable taste: ”My name is Shazia Mirza,” she said. ”At least that’s what it says on my pilot’s license.”

Excellent.

Neat.

You know those pendulum-over-sand desktop curios? I’m sure you do; you swing the pendulum, and it writes a pattern into the sand below, kind of like a spirograph.

Ever wonder what might happen do one during an earthquake?

Truly Strange Events

So this weekend, Erin and I capped a long couple workweeks with a trip to Austin to see one of the Alamo Drafthouse‘s Rolling Roadshow events: the 10 Year Reunion Party for Dazed & Confused. Richard Linklater‘s 1993 film starred a big pile of folks who later became much more famous, including Parker Posey, Milla Jovovich, Joey Lauren Adams, Rory Cochrane, Adam Goldberg, and (of course) Matthew “Naked Bongos” McConaughey (not to mention somebody named Ben Affleck). Since it was such a big deal for them, all of the above (minus Jovovich and Affleck) attended, which was nice. We ha da great time, and (as she will tell you given half a chance), Erin got to shake McConaughey’s hand.

Now, this same weekend, the aformentioned Drafthouse was showing a fan film in its downtown location. This wasn’t just any fan film: it was a 6- or 7-year labor of love by three kids from south Mississippi with time on their hands and a perhaps-unhealthy obsession with Raiders of the Lost Ark. Over the course of, well, the bulk of their youth, Eric Zala, Jayson Lamb and Chris Strompolis remade the 1981 film shot for shot using materials they could find and use, but also with astonishing fidelity to the original. Harry Knowles covers them here (and links to a trailer by Drafthouse maven Tim League), and the Austin Chronicle has more. That’s just pretty damn cool, if you ask me.

Here’s where it gets weird. Saturday, while waiting in line at the Dazed event, someone hollered at me. No surprise; I know lots of people in Austin. Of course, the person hollering wasn’t actually from Austin — she was Mrs. Eric Zala, of the Raiders-remake Zalas. But 11 years or more ago, way back at UA, she was my college girlfriend (see file photo from NoGators companion site). The world is very, very small, notwithstanding the distances from Tuscaloosa to Florida to Texas.

It was nice to see her, since I haven’t in about 10 years. It was nicer still to see she’s doing well, and that she’s ended up with somebody cool. They’re expecting, so we at NoGators want to with them luck. Erin and I were going to head back to the Alamo with them to see the midnight showing of Eric’s film, but, well, we’d been in the Austin sun all day, and by midnight the hotel became an unavoidable destination. I am, however, eagerly awaiting a Criterion DVD.

Okay, this rocks.

I may want one of these more even than a new iPod. It’s a networkable stereo component that reads your digital music collection and spits it out as RCA analog stereo or fiber-optic digital, suitable for consumption by any decent stereo rig. Pair it with the Linksys WET11 and really large RAID array, and I might never have to touch a CD again.

Two War Bits by Brits

The U.K. has had, in general, far better coverage of the war and its surrounding events than the overwhelmingly-rah-rah-rah US media. Here are two stories you may find interesting, not in the least because they provide starkly different information on two war-related topics.

First, this coverage of the events surrounding the dramatic rescue of Jessica Lynch.

Second, another story concerning some (non-fissile) nuclear material, and the US’s failure to guard said even after we knew it was there. While you can’t make a true nuke with this stuff, it’s perfectly fine for a “dirty bomb.” If we care so much about stopping these things…

Dept. of Ignorant Bigots & etc.

Some folks out in Arizona (with the requisite white-supremacist ties) have taking to patrolling the Mexican border and shooting at those attempting to cross. Anti-immigrant folks are forming vigilante squads to address what they see as the authorities’ failure at protecting us from immigrants. They appear to have missed the part about how they themselves are also immigrants, unless their names are “Red Cloud” or “Running Bear.”

What’s happening to my country?

Other People Talking about Still Other People Talking.

Copied, verbatim, from jwz’s livejournal:

A talk given at the Directors Guild of America. He says some interesting things about the history of mass media, dead people, the music industry, and then goes totally gonzo at the end: keep reading until you get to the part where he starts talking about the ubiquitous-computing vaseline and the dog heads.

It’s a fine day when you read something like that. It’s even better that it’s a link to William Gibson.

June Carter Cash, 1929 – 2003

June Carter Cash, one of half of one of country music’s great royal families, died today of complications from heart surgery. She was 73.

In 1950, the 21-year-old June Carter made her Grand Ole Opry debut. Eleven years later, in 1961, the Carters joined Johnny Cash’s road show; it was Carter who wrote Cash’s #1 hit “Ring of Fire” in 1963, a song she later said was about being in love with him; they were married in 1968, and remained so for the rest of her life. She won a Grammy in 1999 for Best Traditional Folk Album (for Press On). She appeared onstage last month at the CMT 2003 Video Music Awards to accept an award on behalf of Johnny, then ailing with pneumonia. [ CMT coverage]

This Just In: Democrats Grow A Spine

In the event you haven’t heard: 52 Texas House Democrats have broken quorum to protest a new redistricting measure being pushed through by the GOP majority. The Republicans control the House, but 100 members (2/3) must be present for any business to transpire.

Gov. Rick “Good Hair” Perry has dispatched the Texas Rangers to arrest the wayward Dems, which of course only works if they were foolish enough to stay in Texas; reports this morning place them in Oklahoma, and even our last Governor knows that’s not part of Texas.

The best part of this whole affair may well be the New Mexico Attorney General Patrica Madrid’s response to Perry’s request that she allow the Rangers to make arrests in her state (from this story):

Madrid said the question is being researched. But she wasn’t taking it all serious. “Some are speculating this request from the Texas Governor’s office concerns an effort to locate missing Texas House Democrats,” Madrid wrote. “If so, Texas should understand that since ski season is over, the Santa Fe Opera has not begun and President Bush was just in town, I don’t think they are in Santa Fe now. Nevertheless, I have put out an all-points bulletin for law enforcement to be on the look out for politicians in favor of health care for the needy and against tax cuts for the wealthy.”

Another View on the Price Rollback

This editorial ran in the UA paper The Crimson White. I fear he may be absolutely correct. Sure, Price acted a fool in Florida. I’m not convinced others haven’t done far worse things, and I’m certainly not convinced that Price’s conduct is the actual reason he was shown the door. Big-time college atheletics is a morally ambiguous game from the get-go; for UA to suddenly decide it’s a moralizing institution is a bit of a stretch.

“It’s Rollin’! It’s Rollin’!”

The continuing sad saga of Coach of the Week at my once-mighty alma mater. Crack Nogators New York/Oceana Legal Correspondent A. P. provides this account of his alleged sins, and notes

I never get this kind of after-hours attention from the strip clubs I frequent.

On an even more surreal note, I offer the following headline from the Crimson White, UA’s student paper: [University President] Witt talks to Jesse Jackson as coaching search continues. Make of this what you will.

Mmmmmmmmeat.

From The Onion’s coverage of the deadly Chicago Meatwave:

Meateorologists speculate that the deadly meatwave was caused by a stationary high-protein ridge extending along the shore of Lake Michigan. They fear that Milwaukee and Kansas City could be next.

Mmmmm. Geek Lust.

The new iPods have a docking station with a line out jack (well, except for the little one, which doesn’t ship with the dock). This means all sorts of good things become much easier, including car mounts and stereo integration. Must. Have.