Maybe that trophy went to the wrong fella after all

In any case, the big trophy comes to Austin for the first time in 35 years: Texas 41, USC 38.

Aside from points, perhaps the most telling stats are these:

  • USC total yards: 574
  • UT QB and Heisman runner-up Vince Young total yards: 467 (200 rushing, 267 passing)

Actually, since we’re posting other stats, we’ll also provide this:

  • Heisman trophies won by active USC players: 2 (Bush this year; Leinart last year)
  • Heisman trophies won by active Texas players: 0.

(We’ll join the chorus once again pointing out, however, that the USC Trojans were not in fact competing for 3 in a row. They were the winners last year (despite Auburn’s record), but there were TWO champs the year before. LSU, much as it pains us to say it, was the other “title” holder that year.)

Sweet Fancy Moses! That’s bad code!

Or, “How looking at bad code makes us realize we’re not bad coders.”

We’re pretty sure we’ve talked about The Daily WTF before, but today’s addition is pretty gawdawful. (The extra “w” makes it worse.)

Earlier today, we had a conversation with another geek about TDWTF and its implications for the trade. We here at Heathen have never been enaged in pure development, so we know our skills aren’t tip-top. We do, however, feel competent — and sites like that makes us feel even better.

Anyway, the conversation got us thinking about what makes a good developer, and how that works, and how you can tell if you suck or not, and this fell out of the dialog:

I’m leary of anyone who says “…. and therefore I’m a good programmer,” but I might cautiously suggest that anybody who, as I do, looks back over older code they’ve written and realizes it needs to be better and then fixes it is probably at least passable, and by this I mean “better than most based on what we see of the trade at dailywtf.” What kills most bad coders may be a simple sort of incuriosity about how things could be better. Like, spending days reinventing wheels, which seems to be a theme at DWTF. [OtherGeek]: Larry Wall says good programmers exhibit laziness, impatience, and hubris. Exactly. I’ve amused many clients by discussing the need to be “lazy enough”. [OtherGeek]: The key point being that lazy people have the sense to say “there has to be an easier way to do this”. Right. This sometimes leads to spending a day writing a routine to accomplish something programmatically that you could have done manually in an hour, but that’s ok.

Food for thought, anyway.

More on the wiretaps

This Miami Herald columnist (Robert Steinback) is spot on:

One wonders if Osama bin Laden didn’t win after all. He ruined the America that existed on 9/11. But he had help. If, back in 2001, anyone had told me that four years after bin Laden’s attack our president would admit that he broke U.S. law against domestic spying and ignored the Constitution — and then expect the American people to congratulate him for it — I would have presumed the girders of our very Republic had crumbled. Had anyone said our president would invade a country and kill 30,000 of its people claiming a threat that never, in fact, existed, then admit he would have invaded even if he had known there was no threat — and expect America to be pleased by this — I would have thought our nation’s sensibilities and honor had been eviscerated. If I had been informed that our nation’s leaders would embrace torture as a legitimate tool of warfare, hold prisoners for years without charges and operate secret prisons overseas — and call such procedures necessary for the nation’s security — I would have laughed at the folly of protecting human rights by destroying them. If someone had predicted the president’s staff would out a CIA agent as revenge against a critic, defy a law against domestic propaganda by bankrolling supposedly independent journalists and commentators, and ridicule a 37-year Marine Corps veteran for questioning U.S. military policy — and that the populace would be more interested in whether Angelina is about to make Brad a daddy — I would have called the prediction an absurd fantasy. That’s no America I know, I would have argued. We’re too strong, and we’ve been through too much, to be led down such a twisted path.

There’s more. Read the whole thing.

2005 in Review

We’re reposting this from Atrios because more people need to read it:

2005 was the year that the president of the United States declared proudly that he had broken the law repeatedly and with full intention, that he had the power to do so whenever he wanted to, and that he would continue to do so whenever he determined it to be desirable. This declaration was met with basic approval from much of the beltway chattering classes, prominent libertarian bloggers, and just about every small government conservative. The issue is simple: Bush has declared that one man has the right to make the law whenever, in his determination, national security warrants it. While even I can understand the necessity of broad executive powers in emergency situations, we aren’t anywhere close to being in one of those. If Bush decides that personally shooting dissident bloggers or pesky journalists in the head is in fact necessary for national security, then no one can object. The fact that he has not, as far as we know, done any such thing does not matter in the slightest. By conferring dictatorial authority on himself Bush has declared that this is, in fact, a dictatorship even if he hasn’t (yet) bothered using such authorities to the fullest of his claimed ability. It’s a mystery why Russert and the gang can giggle over their little roundtables, essentially ignoring what amounts to a military coup by our own president. He’s asserted the authority of commander in chief over the entire country, and not just the military to which the constitution grants him such authority. Yes, we hope and generally assume that this temper tantrum by our boy king will pass in 3 years, that the his overreach will not have long lasting effects, that the crisis will pass. 2005 was the year the president declared he was the law, and few of our elite opinion makers and shapers bothered to notice, or care.

Sounds like a pretty good barometer to us

From here:

The true measure of a nation’s morality is how it operates its secret services.

Sure, it’s really just another way to point out that ethics and honesty matter most when you think nobody’s looking. Everybody plays nice when the lights are on. How you act when you think nobody will find out is the real test, and we’re flunking on that one. Just ask this guy.

Moments for Inappropriate Humor, 2006 Edition

Today, we’re writing documentation. Specifically, we’re documenting the sixty bazillion (yes) packages and such built into our product. (It appears Java cannot wipe its own ass without including sixty bazillion (yes) frameworks, packages, etc.)

Towards the end of the list, we find one whose name amuses us, and we wonder how wrong it would be to include the following definition and license data instead of the stuff found here:

Saxon
British heavy metal band. Uses little-known “bad artistic license.” No known reasonable or appropriate uses outside dark basements filled with pimply middle school (male) nerds and, optionally, D&D paraphernalia. Inclusion with more than one installation of the product at best unwise and at worst impossible.

Amusingly, the band is actually the second real listing returned by Google. The first is the XSLT tool. This makes us giggle.

Record Labels Cutting Off Nose, Spiting Face

BoingBoing and Pandagon both have coverage of the following insert in the new Coldplay CD:
insert

Of course, these rules are only visible after you’ve paid for the CD and brought it home, and as the disc’s rules say, “Except for manufacturing problems, we do not accept product exchange, return or refund,” so if you don’t like the rules, that’s tough. What are the other rules? Here are some gems: “This CD can’t be burnt onto a CD or hard disc, nor can it be converted to an MP3” and “This CD may not play in DVD players, car stereos, portable players, game players, all PCs and Macintosh PCs.” BoingBoing

We’ve no clue if they’ve broken the CD so it won’t play right or not; the copy we have at Heathen Central was purchased long ago, and we had no trouble ripping the tracks at all. Even if it’s just sabre rattling, though, a big “fuck you” to any buyer who wants to play it on an iPod, or any CD player they want, or some DVD players, or whatever. There’s got to be more to this, but that’s all we got for now.