Read this:
You may not be interested in the digital rights war, but that doesn’t mean you’ll have the luxury of sitting on the sidelines. Because the other side is very, very interested in you.
Read this:
You may not be interested in the digital rights war, but that doesn’t mean you’ll have the luxury of sitting on the sidelines. Because the other side is very, very interested in you.
The Brits are already asking Microsoft for a backdoor to Vista’s encryption scheme.
(From here.)
Implanting them to replace key cards. Dumb, dumb, dumb.
(Via BoingBoing.)
The Austin American Statesman is reporting that Whittington was hit with around 100 pellets.
A 28-gauge shell only has about 300 pellets in it. This absolutely does not square with the “thirty yards” bit we’ve been fed earlier. Overnight observation is one thing, too, but Whittington is by all accounts still hospitalized three days later. If you hit someone with 1/3 of the load in as tight a pattern as his injuries suggest (lower face, chest, left shoulder), and he’s in the hospital for days on end, well, your unfortunate hunting parter was substantially closer than 30 yards.
This editorial in the Charlotte Observer backs up what we said yesterday: it is, unequivocably, Cheney’s fault. The writer goes further, too, in exploring the other questionable aspects to this “hunt.” If he’s such an accomplished and avid hunter, he ought to know all the rules listed therein.
Of course, the White House continues to assert it was Whittington at fault, which is plainly bullshit, and is fortunately being called as such:
Several hunting experts were skeptical of McClellan’s explanation. They said Cheney might have violated a cardinal rule of hunting: Know your surroundings before you pull the trigger. “Particularly identify the game that you are shooting and particularly identify your surroundings, that it’s safe to shoot,” said Mark Birkhauser, the incoming president of the International Hunter Education Association, a group of fish and wildlife agencies. “Every second, you’re adjusting your personal information that it is a safe area to shoot or it’s not a safe area to shoot.” Safe-hunting rules published by the National Rifle Association and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department echo Birkhauser’s advice. “Be absolutely sure you have identified your target beyond any doubt,” the NRA says in the gun-safety rules on its Web site. “Equally important, be aware of the area beyond your target. This means observing your prospective area of fire before you shoot. Never fire in a direction in which there are people or any other potential for mishap. Think first. Shoot second.”
There’s more feedback from real hunters here.
From Yahoo/AP:
CHICAGO — The American Bar Association denounced President Bush’s warrantless domestic surveillance program Monday, accusing him of exceeding his powers under the Constitution. The program has prompted a heated debate about presidential powers in the war on terror since it was disclosed in December. The nation’s largest organization of lawyers adopted a policy opposing any future government use of electronic surveillance in the United States for foreign intelligence purposes without first obtaining warrants from a special court set up under the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The 400,000-member ABA said that if the president believes the FISA is inadequate to protect Americans, he should to ask Congress to amend the act. Bush and his administration have defended the warrantless eavesdropping, saying it is needed to fill a gap in U.S. security and is allowable under both the president’s constitutional powers and the congressional measure authorizing him to go to war in September 2001. The ABA has urged Congress to affirm that when it authorized Bush to go to war, it did not intend to endorse warrantless spying.
(Thanks to Triple-F, who appears to be recovering nicely.)
If you shoot somebody when you’re hunting, it’s your fault. Period. When you’re holding a gun, the margin of error is pretty slim (though it’s wider with birdshot than with a deer rifle). This means it’s fundamentally your responsibility where your pellets end up. Josh Marshall backs us up on this with feedback from his hunter-readers. The description from (landowner) Armstrong as paraphrased by Marshall sounds right:
The birds ‘flush’. Cheney picks out a bird and starts following it. In the process he basically wheels around doing a 180. So he’s spun around and is now firing backwards relative to the direction he had been facing. And Whittington was just, for whatever reason, where Cheney didn’t expect him to be.
Which is irrelevant or a lie. Cheney was in a group trying to flush birds, and that means you can’t assume someone isn’t behind you. “Doing a 180” means you need to be very, very, very careful, since that means you have or will end up facing your fellow hunters.
The comments provided by Mary Matalin are clearly just more Republican lies:
The vice president was concerned. He felt badly, obviously. On the other hand, he was not careless or incautious or violate any of the [rules]. He didn’t do anything he wasn’t supposed to do.
We don’t doubt that Cheney feels bad. He should. The reason he should, though, is that he did do something “he wasn’t supposed to do;” he didn’t keep his field of fire clear. He behaved carelessly. And as a result, somebody’s in the hospital. He’s very lucky — as is Whittington, who could easily been killed; we suspect his injuries are more serious than they’re letting on, though, since he’s in ICU. Hunting accidents are no means unheard of (though in a lifetime of hunting, we’ve never seen it happen), but when one does happen, an honorable man admits his fault — as he does with any accident. So our takeaway with the Cheney shooting is that, well, he’s not admitting fault. Make of this what you will.
Update: CNN has a bit more data. Apparently Whittington was about 30 yards away, and Cheney was shooting a 28-gauge. If true, these bits of data taken together suggest there wasn’t much danger of Whittington’s injuries being fatal (though, as we said, only one pellet needs to get lucky).
A 28 is <b>very</b> small. Most hunters just carry the all-purpose 12-gauge, which (when paired with the right load) can take anything from whitetail deer down to small game like quail or rabbit. Smaller shotguns (16, 20, 28, and .410) use progressively smaller amounts of powder paired with fewer pellets per load. Some people use 20s for birds or other small game -- they are lighter guns, and the recoil is easier to take -- but only very rich people carry 28s. There are no "utility" 28s like the $200 shotguns most of Red America buys at Wal-Mart. These are exclusively hand-made or hand-finished guns, probably over-and-unders, with price tags to match (more than $1,500 certainly; more than $10,000 isn't unheard of). Traditional American shotgun companies don't even make them; you have to go to Beretta or other high-end manufacturers.
That Whittington is apparently doing well (and never even lost consciousness, according to the story above) is the result of the small loads involved, his distance from Cheney (30 yards is a long way for a shotgun; it's hard to take any game at that range), the small gauge of the gun, and good luck.
Barack Obama has a plan to fix Detroit. (Link fixed.)
As it turns out, somebody was shooting some high-speed pix during one of the A-bomb tests. These images of the first fractions of a second of the explosion are bizarre and fascinating.
Slacktivist covers this in two posts:
Media Matters points out (as has Olbermann) their little trick in re: Rev. Joseph Lowery’s remarks during Coretta Scott King’s funeral. Lowery made mention of the failure to find WMDs in Iraq, which got a significant amount of applause (23 seconds, according to MM). Fox edited out the applause in replaying the clip, and then made comments about the audience’s lack of response. You don’t get much closer to just plain making shit up than that.
Last night, we enjoyed both Billy Joe Shaver (at a Kinky Friedman for Governor fundraiser) and Grandmaster Flash (at the final installment of Beats for Basquiat at the Museum of Fine Arts).
Media Matters lays it out.
Atrios and Josh explore the nutbird landscape inhabited by young GOP functionaries like George Deutsch. Deutsch himself contents that the scientists he was trying to censor have ties “all the way up to the top of the Democratic party” and were obsessed with embarrassing the president. The even scarier bit is in the second piece linked by Atrios:
The coalition government relied heavily on a revolving door of diplomats and other personnel who would leave just as they had begun to develop local knowledge and ties, and on a large cadre of eager young neophytes whose brashness often gave offense in a very age- and status-conscious society. One young political appointee (a 24-year-old Ivy League graduate) argued that Iraq should not enshrine judicial review in its constitution because it might lead to the legalization of abortion.
The DOJ has opined twice in the last four years that the domestic spying program was probably illegal.
Specifically, they want their programming to be unrecordable by DVRs. Not because of piracy, but because they want to be able to charge you more to watch that episode you missed using their on-demand service.
This is why ideas like the Broadcast Flag must be strangled in their crib. It’s an affront to consumers and a blatant money grab by content producers. HBO is doing very well; they make some of the only TV worth watching, and are able to do so because people like the Heathen are willing to pay them directly to watch it (i.e., rather than being beholden to advertisers). We’re very sad to see that their point of view is no more progressive than the jackasses at the regular networks.
A Federal judge has approved a PATRIOT act request to review someone’s email records (to and from whom, but not contents or subjects) despite the fact that there is no evidence of criminal behavior by the person in question.
At George Harrison’s 2004 induction to the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, Prince stopped by to help out. We suspect this popped up on MeFi because someone saw him kick ass on SNL and remembered “oh yeah — that little dude’s a badass guitar player, too!”
If he comes anywhere near you on tour, pay whatever it costs to see him. Hock something if you have to. Eat ramen for a week or a month if that’s what it takes, but see him. Up close. We saw him in 2004, and it was, bar none, the best damn rock and roll show we’ve EVER seen.
A snail-and-DVD protocol has been experimentally proven to be faster than ADSL.
Make of this what you will.
Someone has made a functioning difference engine out of Lego. Awesome.
Geek productivity guru Merlin Mann’s talking about what goes in your [ bag | pockets | wallet | whatever], and includes a link to his wiki on the subject, which has some interesting suggestions (plus it reminds us that March approaches, and really cool flashlights are precisely the sort of useful thing Heathen are unlikely to buy for themselves).
Our daily tote burden boils down thusly; we can’t very well leave the house without all these bits:
There’s an additional pile o’crap in the bag, which more or less stays stocked for travel as a holdover from our constantly mobile consulting career. We currently move either very little (working at home) or a lot (on client sites), so this bag stays stocked for real travel — though, honestly, it’s not clear what we’d take out if we were just commuting to an office. In a real sense, the bag IS the office now.
In compiling that list, we discovered we also had a null modem adapter and a dreidel in there, but we’ll chalk that up to happenstance. We’ll also cop to the fact that we certainly never leave for very long without reading material, so the bag will tend to also include a book and a copy or two of the New Yorker.
So, what's in your pockets? What's in your work bag?
(* It was either that or “What has it got in its pockets?”, and we figured Gollum is played.)
This oughta keep Lindsey busy for DAYS.
We can’t say we’re sure what this is for, but we’re pretty sure we still want one. I mean, come ON! What’s not to like? It’s called an “Alligator Loper” for crying out loud!
(It, of course, brings to mind a certain earlier post (File foto, from Christmas 2002) about chain saws on sticks. Maybe the Mississippi Heathen Stepfather needs one, too.)
Why is this okay? Why do we permit American companies to be complicit in oppression and evil abroad? We think, perhaps, that American companies ought to have to honor the values of America no matter where they operate. If this makes it hard to expand into dictatorial countries, well, we’re pretty sure that’s a feature, not a bug.
Insight is reporting that Plame-outing turd Karl Rove has threatened GOP senators with blacklisting from all White House aid if they vote against Bush in Judiciary Committee proceedings in re: the illegal wiretapping program.
This is what “scared” looks like.
You can now buy Aerogel chunks from those magnet people.
May 5th is No Pants Day. We’re not celebrating early.
As far as you know.
The FISA law Bush has been violating for years was passed in 1978 in response to Nixon’s abuse of power, so it wasn’t operative for Roosevelt or Lincoln or whomever else they’re trotting out.
There’s a great rundown on FISA here — as well as on the arguments brought by the DOJ — if you’re interested.
Watch the Beltway dynamics closely, and you’ll see he’s thrown in with McCain over Obama. Just just the aisle and be done with it, Joe.
Yeah, he resigned. It seems he’s been lying about graduating from A&M.
(Joy?)
It’s still funny. However, you should not do this to your cat with tape, even if you are on Japanese television.
Whereas the prior example was satirical in nature, this one’s subversive.
Read this to find out. Here’s a tidbit I didn’t know: many if not most are there on scant real evidence, as they were turned over to US forces by rival Afghanis with little or no documentation. Don’t like your neighbor? Tell the Yanks he works for Osama!
“Thanks for your service, son. Sorry about your arm. Now pay up for your lost body armor.”
First, we point you to perhaps the only source for hardcore slash Harry Potter Valentines.
Second, we simply point out the most inappropriate valentine EVER.
From MSNBC:
Feb. 13, 2006 issue — In the latest twist in the debate over presidential powers, a Justice Department official suggested that in certain circumstances, the president might have the power to order the killing of terrorist suspects inside the United States.
So now they’re down not just on checks & balances, judicial review, the separation of powers, and due process, but also on the whole idea of a trial. Excellent. What country is this again?
By now, everyone who’s paying attention is aware of the NASA story wherein a 24-year-old political hack tried to get references to Intelligent Design inserted into discussions of the Big Bang, and further attempted to change all references to said Bang to “Big Bang Theory,” etc.
We’ll just point out that it came as no surprise to us to learn that said jackass is an Aggie.
BoingBoing presents some interesting Asian condoms for our amusement.
First, we have this crack in the GOP veneer, via UPI:
WASHINGTON, Feb. 5 (UPI) — Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, says President George W. Bush’s warrantless surveillance program appears to be illegal.
If we are ever 62-year-old rock icons, we won’t wear midriff-baring t-shirts no matter how fit we are.
A newly released memo makes it very, very clear that Bush was determined to invade Iraq from the get-go despite his assurances to the contrary. Remember “We are doing everything we can to avoid war in Iraq?” MeFi does.
Now they’re going after non-dilutive usages of brands in art; a bill that’s passed the House already would prohibit, among other things, some famous paintings. Read more here. Remember, trademarks are meant to prevent marketplace confusion, not give exclusive rights to a given word or image. (Via MeFi.)
The End of the Internet? From The Nation. Read it.